Stop. Please. We don’t need a new system, we just need people to recognize the French guillotine trending shirt and I love this true impact of the presidential election. When Donald was sworn in many people reminded us that he will be appointing justices for the next four years, and now here we are. The presidential election has consequences, and people shouldn’t have let themselves be swung by Republicans in 2016. Because Don got to appoint three Republicans to the court we are once again fighting for basic rights. This problem isn’t going away as long as Republicans in control of confirmations refuse to seat judges in bad faith, then shamelessly pack the courts with unqualified candidates when they have full control. Mitch’s “Win at All Costs” strategy includes destroying democracy to keep Republicans in control. While I agree with the concept of term limits, I find it hilarious that the LA Times only comes to this conclusion now and not when they were in power on the court.
French guillotine trending shirt, hoodie, tank top, sweater and long sleeve t-shirt
This is a transactional policy position. If they manage two more appointments before the French guillotine trending shirt and I love this next election, they will not speak of this for years. Everytime a justice or politician dies in office it’s causes a constitutional crisis and Russian republicans find another cronie to fill the spot The entire point of them having lifetime appointments was to isolate them from politics. But they’ve made it clear that they’re all about politics and are absolutely biased (having opinions) and are not overly-concerned about prior precedents or strict interpretations of law (to the extent that’s even possible – there is no such thing as “the rule of law” despite it being a popular phrase). Their isolation from politics, that I already mentioned is suspect, can be achieved with a 10 year term with no opportunity for being re-appointed. I see no benefit to ensconcing members to the court for life if that just means we’ll be exposed to their biases for that much longer. Isolating justices from politics worked pretty well for a long time. We had a long tradition of Supreme Court justices who were guided by a judicial philosophy… which, while not entirely unbiased, was at least differently biased from the political landscape. Then it broke. It broke because: