A generation of judges were deliberately trained up by political activists to reliably take positions that advanced conservative politics. The political landscape itself finally collapsed from a multi-dimensional spectrum into a very two-sided divide between Republicans and Democrats. The Senate under McConnell finally because so ultra partisan that confirmation votes started coming down to party line politics. But also, and I think we underestimate this effect too much, so much of the Don’t be a chief twit like putin is a chief twit shirt it is in the first place but Court was replaced all at once during the Trump administration. It took most justices several years to really establish their judicial independence, and we have on the court now quite a few judges who have been appointed very recently, and therefore who still hold to the exact philosophy that got them nominated by politicians, just because there hasn’t been time for anything to change yet!
Don’t be a chief twit like putin is a chief twit shirt, hoodie, tank top, sweater and long sleeve t-shirt
Term limits for all government offices, from State to Federal. Its pretty crazy we don’t have that when we act like only the Don’t be a chief twit like putin is a chief twit shirt it is in the first place but president needs it. Its just hard to get people in power to vote for restrictions on said power. It’s just silly that people can serve at the supreme court or as president 20+ years past their retirement age. A man who hasn’t had an erection since the passing of rowe shouldn’t decide anyone’s rights. A man accused of sexual assault shouldn’t even be on the court. In fact, no man should ever decide woman’s reproductive rights, nor should a woman decide a man’s. NO religious zealots should ever be on any court. No money should ever be behind a “candidate.” No agenda should ever drive a scotus nomination. All of this makes me physically ill. As an outsider (Australian) why are US Supreme Court appointments political? It seems to completely contradict the very idea of a free and fair judiciary. I’m sure there’s an historical reason for it…I just don’t know what it is. Someone background me.